UK Media ape When William Hearst William Randolph Hearst’s: “You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war

UK Media ape When William Hearst  William Randolph Hearst’s: “You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war
This post was originally published on this site

Via @glynbeddau

It is highly when  allegations of sexual misconduct are made about anybody then they should be taken seriously and in the workplace then depending on the nature, they should be dealt from within, though this should never exclude the police being involved and criminal charges made,  by a prosecution.

When we read the reports of the Jimmy Saville sexual abuse scandal and its uncovering it is not only this vile creature that was guilty it is also those who ignored or even covered up his behaviour.
It is probably still happening and it should be uncovered where ever it occurs.
However there appears to be a tendency automatically assume someone is guilty as son as an inquiry is announced ,even when there are no details of the accusation .
The news that there have been   allegations of sexual misconduct made  Alex Salmon is a  case in point.
The UK media and his political opponents  (some would argue they are the same thing, have carefully avoided libel 

To be clear, Alex Salmond has every right to assert his innocence and he must be presumed innocent unless proven otherwise.  It is easy to understand why he might feel aggrieved that the complaints are being investigated in the full glare of publicity, with his name being dragged through the mud in the meantime.  But this story potentially matters.

Indeed Mr Meeks makes the astounding claim that it could resemble the fall of another Nationlist icon in Ireland

For this particular incident has echoes of the politics of a former age, also involving a nationalist movement. In the 1880s, Westminster politics were overshadowed by another nationalist figure: Charles Stewart Parnell. He was instrumental in pushing the cause of Irish Home Rule to the centre of British politics. As a result of his efforts, the Irish Parliamentary Party were kingmakers.The Liberal party split as a consequence and Parnell worked closely with Gladstone to construct a form of Home Rule that could command broad support in Ireland and was acceptable to the rest of the country. The outlines of a potentially lasting settlement were visible.This came crashing down when he was cited as co-respondent in a divorce case. The ensuing scandal made him unacceptable both to the Catholic church that formed a central support of Irish nationalism and the non-conformists who comprised much of the Liberal party.The Irish Parliamentary Party split, with supporters and opponents of Parnell feuding. With the loss of his talents, the cause of Irish nationalism was set back a generation. By the time it re-emerged, attitudes on all sides had hardened.Ireland lives with the consequences of that to this day.As even Nicola Sturgeon would probably accept, Alex Salmond is still by some way the most prominent nationalist politician of the age. The Parnell precedent shows the potential impact on the cause of a long-running squalid sideshow.We have already seen Alex Salmond launch a crowdfunding campaign for his legal fees to demonstrate that he has popular support, and the risk of factions forming looks substantial. So the stakes are potentially high.

Indeed the UK Media have seemed to dicided that, the actual accusations whether true or not are irrelevant because , what is important is that it can damage the SNP.


When William Hearst Artist Frederic Remington, cabled from Cuba in 1897 that “there will be no war,” William Randolph Hearst cabled back: “You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war



It seems this is a case of History repeating itself  the extent in making a ludicrous claim that  that the SNP have split into a what amounts to a civil war


 “SNP faces split over Salmond Sex Claims” thundered the Scottish edition of The Times of London, with its tabloid sibling The Scottish Sun splashing with the headline “SNP ministers told … Stay Away from Eck”.The Daily Telegraph, meanwhile, proclaimed “Split in SNP as MPs back Salmond’s legal fund”.
The i – sister paper of The Scotsman – claimed there was a “Backlash as Salmond raises £85,000 for legal fight”.
The Scottish Daily Mail’s coverage described a “bitter civil war” which the paper said was threatening to “split the party in two”.
And the Scottish Daily Express, following suit, ran the headline “SNP DESCENDS INTO CIVIL WAR” on its front page. Just in case it wasn’t clear, the sub-deck added: “Sturgeon hits back over Salmond’s cash appeal

The response from Scottish Nation lists  have been not that of anger  and rage  but one of ridicule.


Here are some the funniest tweets on the subject.
Whether this helps those who have suffered sexual misconduct is open to question,

About The Author

Become a Patron!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.